From the field to the report.
Ten seconds of video, in situ or in the lab, become a 3D skeleton and metrics placed against their norms.
- of video, in situ or in the lab
- 10 s
- of video, in situ or in the lab
- 3D angles, right and left
- 43
- 3D angles, right and left
- of processing, no markers
- 1 to 3 min
- of processing, no markers
01 · In the field or in the lab
Measurement goes wherever the athlete trains.
- In situ, with a smartphone
On the road, the track or the trail: measurement goes where lab systems cannot.
- Or in the lab
On the trainer or the treadmill, the same analysis, with no markers to attach and no cameras to calibrate.
- One to three minutes
Ten seconds of video; one minute for the side view, three for full 3D.
02 · Mechanical performance
Every angle, compared with the norms.
- 43 angles, right and left
Including what a side view cannot see: knee rotation, pelvic tilt.
- Placed against published norms
The range where studies agree and the range of most measured athletes, by discipline, position and level.
- Across the whole movement
Overlaid pedalling cycles, right and left, and progress from one session to the next.
03 · Paths and forces
For every movement, what the eye cannot see.
- Movement paths
The path of every joint, cycle after cycle: regularity and symmetry of the movement.
- Ground forces, without a force plate
Estimated from the filmed movement: in development.
- Running, walking, squat, jump
The same reading for every movement, with right and left asymmetry as a percentage.
Our norms rest on an in-depth review of the studies and our calculations on published biomechanics methods. Every analysis gives a report to hand to the athlete, sources cited, and its raw outputs to download (OpenSim, JSON).
The decision remains yours. Motion measures and places; you know the athlete, their history and their goals.
The position actually held in a race.
Filmed from a motorbike or a follow car, for the whole squad, then processed in batch.
At the end of the effort
The position that degrades with fatigue, which no measurement on rollers captures.
On the extensions, after two hours
Not the ten seconds held on the trainer: the gap between the two costs watts.
Aerodynamics
Frontal area and CdA estimated from the same video.
Accuracy, measured before it is promised.
Comparing a measurement with a reference system is the only way to know what it is worth. So we give the figure along with its caveat.
In progress
Comparative study
With a biomechanics laboratory, our measurements compared with those of a marker-based optoelectronic system. Early results: a difference of under three degrees on joint angles, still to be confirmed.
Next
The full results
Published with their protocol and the difference measured joint by joint.
For every movement
The same method everywhere
Each new sport compared with the reference before it is offered.
The tool is built around your protocols.
On quotation for clubs, teams, labs and federations: multiple accounts, your reference values, on-site setup.
Custom modules
Your test, your protocol: we build it on our engines, and the whole squad is followed in one place.
Your reference values
Published norms, or your own internal criteria.
Beyond cycling
Running, walking, squat, jump: a new movement is a protocol to write, not a technology to invent.
Try it on your own footage.
15 days to make up your mind, no credit card required. We can also analyse a session you have filmed, together with you.
No commitment · Analyses included in the subscription